IT博客-SAP BI Blog - Collingwood Park-随笔分类-SAP BW&SEMhttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/category/3611.htmlSAP BW/SEMzh-cnWed, 28 Sep 2011 15:11:57 GMTWed, 28 Sep 2011 15:11:57 GMT60Check SAP Note in German as well http://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/archive/2008/04/18/42499.htmlJonathan JiJonathan JiFri, 18 Apr 2008 03:52:00 GMThttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/archive/2008/04/18/42499.htmlhttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/comments/42499.htmlhttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/archive/2008/04/18/42499.html#Feedback0http://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/comments/commentRss/42499.htmlhttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/services/trackbacks/42499.htmlGot an error message of "incorrectly defined FRANGE row in the THX_FROM for inforobject" when executing Key Figure Definition in the BW Query, it was caused by excluding selections in the Query Definition. However could not find a SAP Note in English, and was told by a OSS message that Note in German 1160835 can correct the bug.

I think I could only find it if I had used "BRAIN 415" to search a SAP Note in German. So when could not find a note next time, try in German. But how to understand the content then? By Google...http://translate.google.com/translate_t

-------------------------------------------------------------------
1160835 Note - The definition does not figure. BRAIN 415

Summary

Symptom

Query execution:
It is the message "Incorrect FRANGE line in the THX_FORM to InfoObj <XYZ>" BRAIN 415th


Further terms

Parenthesis. Indicator definition. Explain query.


Cause and conditions

The filter is a stapled feature.
The definition does not figure.



Solution

BW 3.0B / BW 3.10 Content
            Please use the specified corrections management. For the SAP BW releases 3.0B and 3.10 are also up to no longer support packages delivered.

BW 3.50
            Play the Support Package 23 for 3.5 (BW3.50-Patch23 or SAPKW35023) to your BW system. The support package is available if the notice 1146357 with the short text "SAPBWNews BW SP23 NetWeaver'04 stack 23" is released for customers who support this package closer describes.


In urgent cases, the correct leadership of uranium used.
These guidelines can even before the release of the support packages available for advance information available. In this case, however, the short text, the word "pre-release".




Data header

  
Release Status: Released for Customer
Released on: 15.04.2008 10:40:56
Priority: Correction with medium priority
Category: Program Error
Primary Component: BW BEX-OT-OLAP Analyzing Data

Affected Releases

Software component                        From release                 To release  And Release        Following
SAP_BW                                          30                                    30B          30B
SAP_BW                                          310                                  310           310
SAP_BW                                          35                                    350           350
SAP_BW_VIRTUAL_COMP                    30350                               30 B         30B


Corrections Instructions

Correction Instructions     Valid     Validity of Up           software Component                type *)
991214                             30B              30B          SAP_BW_VIRTUAL_COMP               C        
References                                  Last Correction Change
J19K029019                                15.04.2008 08:44:46
 
*) C correction, preliminary B, A reworking, m still not certain work Attributes

Attribute                                                               value
Downtown Port UpPort WF             examination necessary UpPort   

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Not bad Huh?


Jonathan Ji 2008-04-18 11:52 发表评论
]]>Q&Ahttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/archive/2007/12/08/37481.htmlJonathan JiJonathan JiFri, 07 Dec 2007 16:12:00 GMThttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/archive/2007/12/08/37481.htmlhttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/comments/37481.htmlhttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/archive/2007/12/08/37481.html#Feedback1http://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/comments/commentRss/37481.htmlhttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/services/trackbacks/37481.htmlSome friends asked me BI technical questions; I think it is a good idea to have a post to host all.

Q: When I create the infosource, there are two methods, one is infosource with flexible update, the other is infosource with direct update. can you explain the difference between them in detail? Thanks.

A: Flexible update is via update rules, master data (Hierarchy is not applicable) with flexible update is considered as a Data target; Direct update updates Master data only, not via update rules. Please find details @ http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/57/e537373aedaf43e10000009b38f839/frameset.htm

Jonathan Ji 2007-12-08 00:12 发表评论
]]>Comment of Justin1028's Bloghttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/archive/2007/03/07/23712.htmlJonathan JiJonathan JiWed, 07 Mar 2007 14:08:00 GMThttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/archive/2007/03/07/23712.htmlhttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/comments/23712.htmlhttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/archive/2007/03/07/23712.html#Feedback0http://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/comments/commentRss/23712.htmlhttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/services/trackbacks/23712.htmlhttp://www.sapprofessionals.org/?q=sem_bps_learning_hidden_and_useful_stuff.

Actually I have tried PowerSim 3 years ago, it is a very interesting tool. However nowadays not too many companies have a lot of simulation requirements, so BPS and VDT might be their economic choices.


Jonathan Ji 2007-03-07 22:08 发表评论
]]>Year End of 2006http://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/archive/2006/12/22/20969.htmlJonathan JiJonathan JiFri, 22 Dec 2006 04:40:00 GMThttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/archive/2006/12/22/20969.htmlhttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/comments/20969.htmlhttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/archive/2006/12/22/20969.html#Feedback0http://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/comments/commentRss/20969.htmlhttp://www.cnitblog.com/BI-Blog/services/trackbacks/20969.html
Being boring at A Company, I started to look for a shift at beginning of this year. Thanks to the headhunters (of course, they earned money by my jump), two offers falled into my sight, C Company and S Company. C is a German Company who has some local resources especially in SAP new dimension products; S is an Indian Company who has global operations, and also won some local BI projects. Actually salalries they provided are same, and I picked S company for the reason that it just locates downstairs of A Company; I hate the crowded  subway and so I have worked in the same building in this software park for 2 years since I moved to this city.

Another important decision had to be made a month ago when I was on a project in S city. I passed a client interview and was assigned to a SEM project in country B for client J for 2 years; and at same time, an alluring BW job offer came from the consulting department of the most famoust ERP software company.

Being overseas and facing a new enviorment are challenges for me even I had similar experience 5 years ago; but I will benefit from 2 years English-speaking working experience and learn a lot from a large scope SAP implementation, besides I will step into a new industry, Pharmaceutical.

If I took the domestic offer, I can get a 50% raise of my salary, access to latest technologies and products, and a big name in my resume; however I have a bad feeling of domestic SAP project and I also think that experience of business process is more important to me than new technology. 

Another reason is that I'd like to be a SEMer more than a BWer even I got the BW certificates. So, finally I decided to go abroad and take the SEM career path, now I get the WP and will apply for visa soon.

Looking ahead into 2007, I am going to start a new journey; and I am so excited that I still have a young heart and am willing to try new things!

Jonathan Ji 2006-12-22 12:40 发表评论
]]>